Trump's second-term communications have featured a marked rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric across speeches, Truth Social posts, and public statements, with analyses showing such language in over 90 percent of recent addresses compared to roughly 40 percent in his first term. This pattern, driven by ongoing domestic political clashes, legislative pushes, and diplomatic exchanges, sustains elevated trader expectations for daily occurrences. Scheduled events including congressional addresses, campaign-style rallies, and responses to foreign policy developments or media coverage frequently trigger such statements. Markets reflect this consistency through high volumes and pricing that factors in the president's direct, unfiltered approach to targeting individuals personally or professionally. Resolution hinges on verifiable public remarks meeting the insult criteria on the specified date.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$1,311,414 交易量
2026-05-31
May 28
100%
May 31
100%
$1,311,414 交易量
May 28
$479,786 交易量
100%
May 31
$103,393 交易量
100%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's second-term communications have featured a marked rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric across speeches, Truth Social posts, and public statements, with analyses showing such language in over 90 percent of recent addresses compared to roughly 40 percent in his first term. This pattern, driven by ongoing domestic political clashes, legislative pushes, and diplomatic exchanges, sustains elevated trader expectations for daily occurrences. Scheduled events including congressional addresses, campaign-style rallies, and responses to foreign policy developments or media coverage frequently trigger such statements. Markets reflect this consistency through high volumes and pricing that factors in the president's direct, unfiltered approach to targeting individuals personally or professionally. Resolution hinges on verifiable public remarks meeting the insult criteria on the specified date.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
交易量
$1,311,414结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...已提议结果: Yes
有争议
已提议结果: Yes
有争议
最终结果: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's second-term communications have featured a marked rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric across speeches, Truth Social posts, and public statements, with analyses showing such language in over 90 percent of recent addresses compared to roughly 40 percent in his first term. This pattern, driven by ongoing domestic political clashes, legislative pushes, and diplomatic exchanges, sustains elevated trader expectations for daily occurrences. Scheduled events including congressional addresses, campaign-style rallies, and responses to foreign policy developments or media coverage frequently trigger such statements. Markets reflect this consistency through high volumes and pricing that factors in the president's direct, unfiltered approach to targeting individuals personally or professionally. Resolution hinges on verifiable public remarks meeting the insult criteria on the specified date.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$1,311,414结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...已提议结果: Yes
有争议
已提议结果: Yes
有争议
最终结果: Yes
Trump's second-term communications have featured a marked rise in personal insults, profanity, and combative rhetoric across speeches, Truth Social posts, and public statements, with analyses showing such language in over 90 percent of recent addresses compared to roughly 40 percent in his first term. This pattern, driven by ongoing domestic political clashes, legislative pushes, and diplomatic exchanges, sustains elevated trader expectations for daily occurrences. Scheduled events including congressional addresses, campaign-style rallies, and responses to foreign policy developments or media coverage frequently trigger such statements. Markets reflect this consistency through high volumes and pricing that factors in the president's direct, unfiltered approach to targeting individuals personally or professionally. Resolution hinges on verifiable public remarks meeting the insult criteria on the specified date.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题